<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Digital Handshakes on Virtual Receiving Lines Reviews</title>
    <link>http://confabb.com/conferences/17564/sessions/5543</link>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 07:17:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Attendee Reviews of Digital Handshakes on Virtual Receiving Lines</description>
    <item>
      <title>Very useful in thinking about getting away broadcasting to likely voters...</title>
      <link>http://confabb.com/conferences/PDF2007/sessions/5543/details#281</link>
      <description>I think Danah had some very useful insight into how to use internet technology to actually improve the state of our democracy - how to better engage people, how to reach younger people. Simply great.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 07:17:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://confabb.com/conferences/PDF2007/sessions/5543/details#281</guid>
      <author> Arjun Singh</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>lacklustre</title>
      <link>http://confabb.com/conferences/PDF2007/sessions/5543/details#278</link>
      <description>Apparently I was the only person at PDF who had not heard of Danah Boyd (actually upon seeing her profile I remembered I've read her blog once).

The idea of her presentation was that candidates should post on people's myspaces and facebook walls and whatnot. Great. But outside of the obvious credibility question (is it the candidate himself or staff?), is the bogus argument that, hey, candidates spend tons of time shaking hands and kissing babies, why not spend hours posting comments online?

The simple answer is that those two things are not comparable. Countless studies have shown that people who meet a candidate face to face are MUCH more likely to vote for him after than before. So the question is not about spending time, it's about maximizing time PER VOTE GAINED. 

And in that regard, shaking hands and facebooking are just not comparable. </description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 09:53:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://confabb.com/conferences/PDF2007/sessions/5543/details#278</guid>
      <author> Pascal-Emmanuel Gobry</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>forceful</title>
      <link>http://confabb.com/conferences/PDF2007/sessions/5543/details#260</link>
      <description>Connecting the loss of mallspace to big box stores to the higher priority of online space rings true for me.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 00:17:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://confabb.com/conferences/PDF2007/sessions/5543/details#260</guid>
      <author> Mike Slattery</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Excellent</title>
      <link>http://confabb.com/conferences/PDF2007/sessions/5543/details#253</link>
      <description>Yes, danah was good as always. The perfect ten minute speech, really: no slides but with such a clear focus.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 20:03:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://confabb.com/conferences/PDF2007/sessions/5543/details#253</guid>
      <author> Jill Walker</author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Terrific speaker!</title>
      <link>http://confabb.com/conferences/PDF2007/sessions/5543/details#252</link>
      <description>Would love to hear more from Danah!</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 19:56:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://confabb.com/conferences/PDF2007/sessions/5543/details#252</guid>
      <author> Chris Tuttle</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

